On Fri, Apr 14, 2006, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > fre 2006-04-14 klockan 16:46 +0800 skrev Adrian Chadd: > > > Why not? It should call the close handlers shouldn't it? > > It should.. > > but as I said the code looks a bit confused at the moment. Need to read > it again to remember what I really intended.
Ok. Was anything ever written to define/clarify the semantics of connection pinning (at least for NTLM authentication) ? I couldn't find anything with a quick browse with google defining the behaviour (so I could see how the error condition should be handled.) Let me know when you have something and I'll test it out. Adrian
