On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 00:58 +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote: > > On 23/04/2006 12:41 a.m., Robert Collins wrote: > > Asking adrian on irc - ' > > 22:34 < adrian__> Enough people using it as a traditional forward cache > > 22:34 < adrian__> and saying there aren't any strange problems > > 22:34 < adrian__> Because its got a bad name > > ' > > > > So, what is required. How can we engage the community in making squid-3 > > stable ? There seems to be non-trivial interest in making it happen, but > > whats the actual benchmark ? > > I'll start using it again and pushing forward with bug reports if there's > someone there to work on them...last time I tried squid-3 I was seeing some > odd > stuff with client side connections being closed randomly and requiring > frequent > refreshing with my end browser, but at the time I didn't gather anything > useful.
There are definately people doing things around the source - I think harnessing the energy is the issue. I only have a small amount of time, and I'll probably be using it on toolchain support to make it easier for others to fix bugs - because thats something effective I can do in the timeframes I have available. I've added some missing files - I could swear I had added them. Is that better? Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
