-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Robert Collins wrote: > Asking adrian on irc - ' > 22:34 < adrian__> Enough people using it as a traditional forward cache > 22:34 < adrian__> and saying there aren't any strange problems > 22:34 < adrian__> Because its got a bad name > ' > > So, what is required. How can we engage the community in making squid-3 > stable ? There seems to be non-trivial interest in making it happen, but > whats the actual benchmark ?
My own criteria: be able to deploy Squid3 with ESI as a reverse accelarator under real load without it falling over (I don't run Squid as a forward-cache at all). Can somebody point to a current "how to help with Squid3 development" document? E.g., I don't even know how to get a current checkout any longer (arch / bzr / cvs, whatever). Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFETPWm+gerLs4ltQ4RAl5dAJ9IN2rNtvpXjHjgDtpapPB2z6bj4ACeLx1Y EPWCOkwC+zvZxmOd9L1uSog= =KCpK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
