On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 19:08 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> > 3. handleIMSGiveClientNewEntry() used to call processMiss() - this > > caused the duplicate request in bug 1561, and has gone. Was there a > > reason for doing it this way that still stands? > > Not that I can think of. I can think of one possibility: ESI needs a full body to process - an IMS hit on an ESI page requires all the included pages to also be unmodified. So it may have been how I ensured we processed a full page. But it sure sounds suspect, like its bitrotted since that original intent. Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
