On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 14:39 -0600, Duane Wessels wrote: > > > On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Robert Collins wrote: > > > Duane, how do you feel about me inlining the ICAP Makefile into the src > > Makefile ? It makes it easier for automake to track dependencies, > > particular when building individual files - less recursion etc. > > Um, I guess. I certainly don't have a strong enough opinion to stop it. > > Sometimes its nice to run make from a subdir and > not have to worry about wasting time compiling other junk.
Yes, I can understand this. Assuming I do this, 'cd src && make ICAP/libicap.a' will make just whats needed for libicap.a. > In general I think the source tree needs more subdirs, but I care less > about how the makefiles work. I agree too - one for acls, one for the store, one for the event loop - are currently in my consciousness > So you also plan to do away with libicap.a? Not at all. Libraries are great abstraction points for grouping functionality. We can remove it if you want to, but I had not intention of doing so. Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
