sön 2006-07-30 klockan 23:55 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordstrom: > Thinking. Why are we using sysv ipc for diskd? Why not the normal ipc > channel created by ipcCreate? But we should at least monitor it for > close...
monitor part done.. still a bit doubtful if sysv ipc really is good here, or if we would be better off switching to using a normal STREAM IPC like for most other helpers. (a DGRAM IPC channel could also work, but delivery is not guaranteed on all platforms) One benefit of switching to using a normal IPC channel is that the need for comm_quick_poll_required() would go away, also getting rid of the related 400KB/s cache hits issue under low loads.. (4KB reads, 10ms poll interval) Regards Henrik
signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
