tis 2007-03-27 klockan 22:09 +0200 skrev Guido Serassio: > It's almost clear, but I'm just a little confused on the logical side > of the things: use an int argument to check for an unsigned char. > Really a confusing prototype .....
The acceptable range is an unsigned char or EOF. EOF is a value outside the range of unsigned char, usually -1 and therefore the int prototype. Same kind of value range as you may get from getchar/getch/fgetc. This whole char / signed char / unsigned char mess is a quite problematic spot of the C language. Nearly impossible to get signedness correctly without a lot of headache.. > Henrik, now I don't have a CVS access, if it's not a problem I will > fix this in few days. It's not a problem. The related code (the HTTP parser optimizations) is not planned to be merged into 2.6 at the moment. Regards Henrik
signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
