Alex Rousskov wrote:
Hi there,
I went through the remaining Squid3 non-enhancement bug reports
targeted for 3.0. For most bugs, I was able to close or comment in the
bugzilla. The following bugs are special because the questions did not
seem appropriate for bugzilla. Please review.
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1345
Bug 1345 - Problem with tar-file
Squid3 needs a volunteer to remove cppunit from the distribution
and, probably, from CVS. Anybody is willing to do that? This is
a perfect work item for folks who hate C++ development as it
should not require much C++ programming...
yay! this has been causing me some nightmares just thinking about it.
I'll get onto a purge this weekend unless there is anyone else who wants
to do it or veto it.
Speak up within 8 hours or I'll create a 'nocpp' branch and get to work.
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1475
Bug 1475 - File descriptor limit does work.
I am not sure what the final resolution for this bug is. Henrik?
Adrian?
ESI bugs targeted for 3.0
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=951
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1088
If nobody is willing to work on ESI now, I would like to bump
any 3.0 target milestone for ESI to 3.1 because ESI is an
optional feature. Any objections?
Also, there are quite a few bugs targeted for 3.1 and bugs without a
specific target. I reviewed the ones without a target for possible 3.0
inclusion and updated some of the comments. If there is a Squid3 bug
that is not targeted for 3.0 release, but you think it should, please
flag it as such.
Thank you,
Alex.