> On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 09:43 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 06, 2007, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: >> >> > Maybe. I'll leave that to you to judge. Don't have a clear opinion >> > either way. But why not? >> > >> > HTCP and SNMP is very non-intrusive, just enabling code which is never >> > used unless configured in squid.conf, with no significant change in >> > other code. >> >> Maybe one of the goals for squid-3.1 should be runtime loadable dyanmic >> modules for "stuff". >> >> (Although I'm not sure how well that'd work with C++ and its symbol >> munging..) > > It works fine and easily. In fact a number of the current modules are > runtime enabled, though statically linked. > > That said, doing dynamic loading has GPL implications that I'm not > currently comfortable with. >
What would those be? Amos
