> On ons, 2007-09-26 at 11:53 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote: > >> It occurs to me that a method superficially similar to that used for >> cache_peer could look nice here. >> >> - define icap_service with specific details, options +name on a single >> line >> - define icap_access <name> <acl ...> > > Isn't that what is already there? > > http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.0/cfgman/icap_access.html > > Regards > Henrik >
Weird. You are right. icap_class even says "If there are multiple services per vectoring point, they are processed in the specified order." Which entire point of this thread AFAIK is that there _aren't_ multiple services allowed in Squid3 per vectoring point. Amos
