Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 15:57 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 11:10 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
The chart is ONLY for features which are available in at least one minor
release of squid (not counting snapshots or HEAD). Others should
reference
a plan/roadmap, like you are creating, of features not yet integrated.
Yes, your cool IPv6 feature table is different and independent from the
roadmap pages. Automating your table is probably not worth the trouble
and not possible without programming MoinMoin.
I am not sure where on the wiki your IPv6 table should go. I do not
think it belongs to the RoadMap because it is not about tracking Squid
development progress but rather tracking availability of a single
feature in various releases.
<snip>
Ah, stop that train... :-) the new version has nothing to do with IPv6 now.
It's tracking completed "These are DONE" features in formal release of squid.
Oh, I see. My fault.
With the current version, it looks like you really care about users
running Squid 2.5 :-).
I thought it would show how may items are P/X/- in 2.5 for those
diehards still using it.
All its done so far is prove the concept of 2.6 having many more
features than 2.5 wrong. Though its early days yet.
Glad to see only one feature where Squid3 is
lacking. I am sure the difference between Squid2 and Squid3 will grow
with time.
So far. so far. Remember the list is based on 3 and fleshed out from
there. I haven't gone through the formal devel projects list yet for
items to add. Bugzilla still has quite a few features listed as need
porting.
You may want to add ICAP support ("P" in Squid2 and "C" in Squid3).
True. Done.
This page can go wiki:Features or perhaps wiki:Features/ReleaseMap or
even wiki:Features/Meta/ReleaseMap (to ease filtering out of meta pages
in features auto-listings).
Amos
