On tis, 2007-11-27 at 23:27 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:

> Sigh. We need to clean up these MD5 issues before they propagate further.

Not sure how much issues Squid-2 is having with it at the moment.. I am
fine with leaving it as it is until people complain.

> Has the renaming fix in Squid-3 shown ANY problems since Duane committed 
> it?  If not, I'm proposing a cross-over to make the Squid-2 code identical.

Had to fix the OpenSSL glue (in both versions). Working compile with
--with-openssl is a MUST. If it can use other MD5s then that's fine..

Note: The bundled MD5 implementation is a quite poor performer.

Regards
Henrik

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to