On tis, 2007-11-27 at 23:27 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: > Sigh. We need to clean up these MD5 issues before they propagate further.
Not sure how much issues Squid-2 is having with it at the moment.. I am fine with leaving it as it is until people complain. > Has the renaming fix in Squid-3 shown ANY problems since Duane committed > it? If not, I'm proposing a cross-over to make the Squid-2 code identical. Had to fix the OpenSSL glue (in both versions). Working compile with --with-openssl is a MUST. If it can use other MD5s then that's fine.. Note: The bundled MD5 implementation is a quite poor performer. Regards Henrik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part