That's kind of what I was thinking, but was balking at the extra
logic. If it's already hanging around, all the better.
On 23/01/2008, at 4:18 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008, Mark Nottingham wrote:
Short version: When an accelerator, Squid tends to omit the port
number from its idea of what the request-URI is. This screws up
logging, helpers, acls, etc.
See:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2192
Read the bug. Perhaps that should be changed to include the port if
the port
!= the default port for the protocol?
urlCanonical() has an example for dealing with that.
Adrian
--
- Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial
Squid Support -
- $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in
WA -
--
Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
