On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 21:11 +0200, Tsantilas Christos wrote: > Also I am evaluating the following: > http://invisible-island.net/bcpp/bcpp.html > > It does not have a lot of configuration parameters but looks safer than > astyle. > In the other hand makes a lot of changes in the current code. > Also it is significant faster than formater.pl/astyle combinations. > > I am running it with the following parameters: > bcpp -bcl -yb -f 1 -ylcnc -i 4 filename.cc > > At this time the only bad think I found is: > > AConstructor::AConstructor( ...): chld_cnsotr(),chld2 _constr() ... > { > } > > converts to: > > AConstructor::Constructor( ...): > chld_cnsotr(), > chld2 _constr() > { > }
I do not see that as a blocker. Our current init lists are malformed in worse ways. If bcpp would indent the data member names, that would be perfect. Changes in the current code are only bad for outstanding patches and forgotten branches, right? If everybody applies the same formatting to all their branches and HEAD, we should not have many conflicts, right? Thank you, Alex.
