On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 13:24 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > Yes, but I think more thought needed to go into teaching the store > about > sparse objects (which the backend store hooks don't cover);
They don't yet, thats definitely true. > teaching the > store about re-populating the memory cache (which is needed for range > request > processing -and- for general better performance); Needed for more that fragements. Not needed any more for range requests than any other. > is there any code to properly > process range replies and spit stuff into the store. Yes. http.cc had that last I looked. > As I said, a lot of it hasn't been done (I don't think 60% is a > credible > answer) and I think "handle range requests" is something that needs to > be > thought of as part of a squid internal planning/discussion rather than > something seperate. Well sure you can assess the amount of work done/to do differently. I think that if I sat down to do it, it would be less work to go than I've already put in on the outside of the store. -Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
