On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 11:15 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: > - I'm kind of in favour of it as a pure file-movements-only > alteration. 3.2 has no feature-requests yet and back-porting across a > file-re-arranged setup is likely to be more trouble than its worth.
bzr tracks renames and merges changes across them fine. bzr operates using abstract file identifiers, separate from the file names. you only run into trouble from tree reshuffles if you split/merge files, or don't tell bzr that you are renaming a file.. bzr help mv Regards Henrik
