On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 02:01 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: > I'd like some > input regarding whether to back-port the following changes: > > - testheaders.sh alterations (b8892 etc) > > We have two options here. First is the entire change, .sh script and > all. Second is to just port the code changes, leaving the tester itself > for 3.1-only.
I would recommend backporting essential code changes only, if any. We already had a few examples where innocent-looking backports broke things, hurting users and delaying v3.1 work. Let's try to raise the bar a little and see what happens. Thank you, Alex.
