I think at least a warning in cache.log would be good, so people are
aware of how often it happens, and can discover why a particular
request is a miss.
On 07/04/2008, at 6:52 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
I didn't test 2.6 today, but I know from earlier that it falls back
on
miss on large response headers.
Testing again to be sure and indeed it does. And not even a warning
in
cache.log about it..
Cute. Ok. Can we now release Squid-2.7 ? :)
Adrian
--
- Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial
Squid Support -
- $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in
WA -
--
Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
