I know, I know. I even had a quick chat with Randall Stewart about this at BSDCAN, who is one of the driving forces behind all of this SCTP stuff.
SCTP is a great idea. Fleshing out a draft spec for how to have it live along-side HTTP/TCP? Even better. :) On Sun, Jun 01, 2008, Matt Benjamin wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > This is true. There are some neat ideas (and apparently firefox > patches) in > > http://www2006.org/programme/files/xhtml/2035/2035-natarajan-xhtml/2035-natarajan-xhtml.html > > The most compelling reason to use SCTP for HTTP delivery would seem to > be the potential to improve throughput via SCTP multi-streaming. > > Adrian Chadd wrote: > | Hi, > | > | I've spoken to some SCTP related people about this before. > | The trouble is: > | > | * NOone's fleshed out how HTTP over SCTP should look; > | * Noone's fleshed out how servers should choose HTTP over TCP vs SCTP. > | > | They're the much more pressing questions. > | > | > | > | Adrian > > > - -- > > Matt Benjamin > > The Linux Box > 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 > Ann Arbor, MI 48104 > > http://linuxbox.com > > tel. 734-761-4689 > fax. 734-769-8938 > cel. 734-216-5309 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFIQrWTJiSUUSaRdSURCIAPAJkBWRGOfrIN/eIc7+wcCWkxTHBYMgCfTj7+ > K2AlxaPdb6+W/HMIPDWjkzE= > =Kh3i > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support - - $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in WA -
