.. no symbols?!
Adrian 2008/7/20 Mark Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sorry it took so long; see below. > > (gdb) bt > #0 0x0000000800bcb89c in pthread_testcancel () from /lib/libpthread.so.2 > #1 0x0000000800bb95c3 in sigaction () from /lib/libpthread.so.2 > #2 0x0000000800bbb0e2 in sigaction () from /lib/libpthread.so.2 > #3 0x0000000800bb4db6 in pthread_kill () from /lib/libpthread.so.2 > #4 0x0000000800bb4633 in raise () from /lib/libpthread.so.2 > #5 0x0000000800fce63d in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6 > #6 0x000000000043539e in xassert () > #7 0x0000000000428652 in clientCacheHit () > #8 0x0000000000422d19 in storeClientCopyHeadersCB () > #9 0x000000000048c7e6 in storeClientCallback () > #10 0x000000000048d0a3 in storeClientReadBody () > #11 0x00000000004a4c56 in storeAufsReadDone () > #12 0x00000000004a7272 in aioCheckCallbacks () > #13 0x00000000004900f3 in storeDirCallback () > #14 0x000000000043439a in comm_select () > #15 0x0000000000467ac9 in main () > > > Need anything more specific? > > Cheers, > > > On 08/07/2008, at 1:44 AM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > >> On tis, 2008-07-08 at 13:30 +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote: >>> >>> Seen again. >> >>>> assertion failed: store_client.c:172: "!EBIT_TEST(e->flags, >>>> ENTRY_ABORTED)" >>>> >>> Perhaps this? >>> >>> http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.7/changesets/12220.patch >> >> Maybe. Quite likely related. Most likely there is some store client >> forgetting to check for abort. But yes, that patch males ENTRY_ABORTED a >> bit more likely condition than before. >> >> Should be very easy to fix if you could get a stack trace of the >> failure. >> >> Regards >> Henrik > > -- > Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
