On tis, 2008-07-22 at 08:51 +0200, Guido Serassio wrote: > With bzr we have already killed Squid3 on Windows, do you also want to > kill Squid2 ???????
No, we do not want to make your life any harder than it is. But at the same time we are really pushing the limits of CVS far beyond what it can sustain. No matter what happens with the main repository CVS will be kept on devel.squid-cache.org for as long as there is developers using CVS, mirroring the trunks and branches needed by those developers, and is partly why I propose that the SquidNT branch is moved back there until things settle. This way you get almost completely shielded from whatever VCS experiments or migrations going on, with the exception being when you need to commit something back on the main branch/trunk. A possible drawback may be the lack of release tags, but are you using those today or just syncronising the cvsmerge updates with when the releases are made? (such tags can be added to the mirror if needed) Regards Henrik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part