On ons, 2008-08-27 at 11:43 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: > My vote is not to vote until it is clear what you are implementing. > > The original discussion was about meaningful strings and opaque buffers > they will use. Then you said that you are not implementing a string, > just a buffer. Right now, I have no idea what you are implementing so I > cannot suggest a name for it. > > Since your code is going to be isolated, it would be easy to rename your > classes during the review process.
+1 on that. Regards Henrik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
