Hi all,
I believe that the D&C design is better than Universal Buffer because of many reasons. My sense is that the Universal Buffer will be very complex and will not have the desired results, because the real problems exist in other subsystems (eg parsers).

But if choosing the D&C design means that we are going to wait for 2 or more years to be implemented because of the lack of the development time maybe it is better to accept the Universal Buffer design. It will not solve all the problems but it is not bad, it is an improvement.

But again I like the idea of a well designed Buffers Api, where buffer classes handle different cases and String be a class (or classes) which operates on Buffer (sub-)regions.

Regards,
   Christos.

Reply via email to