On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Mark Nottingham wrote: > > > > If you don't already, it would be good to explain the risks of using > > it over port 80 in the document, and perhaps do something stronger to > > discourage such use. Likewise, a note about the dual protocol port not > > being a preferred setup would be helpful, if only in making it go down > > a bit smoother in the IETF. > > I've tried to do this. Please let me know if you think the wording > should be stronger; I wasn't exactly sure how much hand-holding was > appropriate. (The text is in the new "Establishing a connection" > section.)
Actually I'm getting an error message from the upload tool (something about the tool being disabled for a few days or something?), so in the meantime you can see the text here: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/.ietf-websocket-protocol/draft-hixie-thewebsocketprotocol-23 -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
