ons 2009-08-19 klockan 19:20 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordstrom: > ons 2009-08-19 klockan 16:15 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: > > Henrik, this is the new memory-promotion patch dying. > > Does not look like the patch, but I will look into it regardless.
In fact it was... For some reason I tried to optimize the caller which exposed this fragile point of the cache_mem maintenance when dealing with "private" objects. Still thinks the assert should go, but that's another day when the cache_mem maintenance is looked over, the current code has room for improvement in both style & performance. Regards Henrik
