> > > > * Do you need an L suffix for large unsigned constants like 0xFFFFFFFF? > > Please investigate. I do not know the answer, but I recall seeing such > > suffixes elsewhere: > > http://www.google.com/search?q=0xFFFFFFFF+vs+0xFFFFFFFFL > > I thought that indicated "long" type to be used. When stored as 64-bit > values. > > Which brings up a question of whether it really is an architecture > dependent int field or uint32_t for mark.
You're right, it's a fixed size. I've checked the kernel code and marks are defined as u_int32_t/uint32_t. I'll change to uint32_t throughout. Andy
