On 12/01/11 12:14, Henrik Nordström wrote:
tis 2011-01-11 klockan 11:37 +0100 skrev Fabian Hugelshofer:
What do you think about removing the special handling for Mozilla/3 and
Netscape/3 agents from HttpMsg.cc?
+1 from me.
How large is the chance that there is still an affected browser in use?
Pretty close to none. And if there are those can be fixed in their local
configuration to disable the use of persistent connections.
Regards
Henrik
There are two cases here, the Netscape one, yes is close to none.
However as you pointed out there are download agents using Mozilla/3.0.
How certain are we that the second hack case for that agent string is
not aimed at a popular one of them?
FWIW: +1 from me, I'm game to try and kill this on performance grounds
and push to get any remaining broken agents fixed.
Amos
--
Please be using
Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.10
Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.4
