On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Amos Jeffries <squ...@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:00:14 +0200, Kinkie wrote: >> >> If you guys are OK, I'll merge the current implementation, then we can >> alter it post-merge. >> >> Right now what Squid does is A1->B2 for all directives except for >> max-stale, for which it does B4 (forward valueless). This is probably >> the worst thing that can be done. >> >> IMHVO the best thing we could do is forward things we can't parse >> as-is (A2-B3). If we change nothing we can probably also keep a copy >> of the raw directives, saves some cycles to reassemble it at pack-time >> . > > > I'm okay with an intermediary polish-only merge as long as its not adding or > changing the behaviour mess. > > If it is changing behaviour then may as well make sure there are no known > bugs in the post-merge result.
No behaviour changes. These will have to wait until a consensus is reached. Ok, merging. Thanks -- /kinkie