On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 15:22 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:33:47 +0000, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The attached patch adds a mask option to the qos_flows miss
> > configuration value. The reason for this is to allow the preserved
> > mark/TOS value from the server to be altered slightly rather than
> > overwritten completely.
> >
> > Example usage. The following will preserve the netfilter mark, but 
> > will
> > ensure that the (9th) bit specified in the miss value will be set to 
> > 1
> > in the preserved mark:
> >
> > qos_flows mark miss=0x100/0xF00
> >
> > Andy
> 
> 
>  +1. Looks fine.
> 
>  I'm not sure the bad mask needs to be fatal. It could be set to default 
>  mask after the error. If you agree that can be altered on commit and 
>  this go in now.

Agreed. Thanks.

Andy


Reply via email to