fre 2012-04-13 klockan 13:21 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov: > Yes, but primarily because the "extension" is not clearly defined. This > is something we can address in ICAP Errata, I guess: Provide a > definition of what should be considered a "file extension", with a > disclaimer that not all agents will use the definition provided. It > would not solve all the problems but would be better than doing nothing.
ICAP was designed for HTTP. HTTP does not have file name extensions, HTTP have content types. Regards Henrik
