On 20.06.2012 05:16, Kinkie wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Kinkie <gkin...@gmail.com> wrote:
OpenBSD is not unsupported past 5.0 nowdays. I've dropped 4.8 from
the
stable branch matrix, left 4.9 there. But was wondering if we
should
continue to test on 4.8/4.9 at all on 3.2+
Well, the build issues there are squid-caused from what I can see,
caused by the unavailability of Shm and failures to properly link
in
the wake of its absence - it may be the only platform we have which
doesn't support shm and this may be its value.
Apart from that, I'll just set up a new OpenBSD node and drop the
older ones, no problem.
Hm.. OpenBSD 5.1 on amd64 is having kernel crash issues on kvm.
I'll try x86.
The x86 OpenBSD 5.1 node seems stable; if nobody objects I'll
gradually dismiss the other nodes.
4.8 can go IMO. I'm kind of in favour of keeping 4.9 around just to
maintain 3.1 support.
Amos
