On 7/10/2012 10:37 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
Here is the correct version of that corrupted commit message for trunk r12345:----------- Do not check 'reply content_length is too big' condition twice. Saves a few CPU cycles. No visible runtime effects are expected. The semi-duplicate check was introduced in trunk r4410 while trying to prevent huge objects from being swapped out. It is not clear to me why that change helped at the time (but it could have something to do with negative content_length values and their effect on then-current size types). ----------- Thank you, Alex.
Done to 3.2 as r11677. Amos
