On 11/03/2012 06:56 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 4/11/2012 12:55 a.m., Kinkie wrote: >> Hi all, >> Is it maybe time to resuscitate StringNG, with the target of merging >> in time for 3.3? > > It is too late for 3.3 features and polish now. > But 3.4 is not scheduled for branching until next March and StringNG > should be able to make that IMO.
I hope v3.4 will be branched sooner than March 2013, but I agree that StringNG is a good candidate for that version. >> If we agree, any preference on how to proceed? > > Waiting for that agreement. Then merge. I plan to review the current code this week. IIRC, there were doubts whether the new string buffers support header manipulation and I/O patterns we need. I need to double check that they do. Thank you, Alex.
