On 11/23/2012 7:29 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 23/11/2012 4:20 p.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
The last post I wrote with the very very long diff seems to be the one.
You referring to the email of 24th Oct? You said that was not quite
ready and I can see a lot of formatting bits with missing lines which
Well it wasnt formatted and not ready as "PATCH" but ready as works and
tested with specific problem I'm not sure why segmentation happens and I
want to solve it.
<SNIP>
(I rewrote *some* code about 5 times to match updates)
I'm not very keen the idea of having the visible parts of it present but
not working. Whatever goes into trunk needs to perform as documented -
omitting a bundled helper and marking some store types as not-tested-yet
is fine. But the Squid portion needs to at least be usable when it goes
public.
We can break the whole project changes down into a few individual steps.
1) a patch that only does all those url() --> originalUrl() changes.
That will shrink down the amount of work a lot and I think can be done
right now, yes?
OK will do.
2) review of the feature patch to see if there are any other bits like
above, or if the whole thing is ready.
3) release notes and config documentation.
Will get there when.. we will.
Eliezer
--
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations
eliezer <at> ngtech.co.il
