Moved to squid-dev as we are getting into code details...

On 22/05/2013 10:45 p.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
On 2/6/2013 11:49 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
mos, bug 3763 is not about setuid(0) warnings, although both bugs may
have been caused by the same Coverity-inspired motivation to check the
return values of system calls.

Simone, yes, I think you should report the setuid warning bug. If you
do, please note that it appears to be BSD-specific.


Thank you,

Alex.
I have a case on FreeBSD and it's confirm only on FreeBSD and not linux.
What can we do with it?
Do we want to handle it?

I had the idea that we could add a new Kid type of "Helper" and differentiate the spawned helper processes with it:
http://master.squid-cache.org/~amosjeffries/patches/FreeBSD_silence_nosuid_mk1.patch

that above builds but that is all I tested.

Amos

Reply via email to