On 28/09/2013 3:18 a.m., Tsantilas Christos wrote:
On 09/27/2013 08:23 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
Using approach (2) with flexible RE delimiter, we could write
acl foo url_regex /ends[) (]/
or
acl foo url_regex {ends[) (]}
or
acl foo url_regex @ends[) (]@
and it will all work without double escaping.
Alex, in the "Revised approach to fixing configuration syntax" mail
thread you are proposing to use "regex::" prefix for regular
expressions. This is required for grammar consistency.
This is means that the regex should like :
acl foo url_regex regex::/ends[) (]/
or
acl foo url_regex regex::{ends[) (]}
or
acl foo url_regex regex::@ends[) (]@
Okay Alex I think we can agree on that flexible-delimiter syntax to
avoid escaping.
I also agree with that regex:: prefix.
Is there anything else we have been disagreeing on?
Amos
