On 11/30/2013 12:24 PM, Kinkie wrote: >>> I think we really should be ref-counting these pointers to make it a bit >>> more flexible and ensure that they do not get erased while in use. >> >> Yes, of course. Refcounting would also improve the >> AclMatchedName-related code significantly. I cannot volunteer to do the >> required legwork at this time, unfortunately. >> >> >>> +0. I have no objections for this going in now while we consider the above. >> >> Will commit soon unless somebody else finds a reason not to.
Done as trunk r13165. > Please do commit but add an XXX remembering the future us to do the > refcount legwork. Done as trunk r13166. Thank you, Alex.
