On 07/11/2014 07:34 AM, Reiner Karlsberg wrote: >>> The only way to support Squid caching of PageSpeed variants without >>> repeated round trips to the origin server is using two Squids. The >>> parent Squid would cache origin server responses while the child Squid >>> would adapt parent's responses and cache adapted content. Needless to >>> say, running two Squids (each with its own cache) instead of one adds >>> significant performance/administrative overheads and complexity.
> Not such a big deal. Agreed. For you and many others, it is not a big deal indeed. > The more professional solution using a PageSpeed module combined with > squid > would only be of practical advantage for large scale users, like ISPs, > in need of best performance and flexibility. Exactly! The "need of best performance" [and least administrative overhead] is what we are trying to accommodate in this case. Since many Squid improvements during the last 5+ years are sponsored by "large scale users", I do not think it is a good idea to reject their requests just because they are irrelevant to others. What do you think? Cheers, Alex.
