actually, the major problems are:

Once workers > 1, squid looks for /var/run/squid. pidfile for workers=1 is done 
in squid.conf, but for workers > 1, this will be ignored.

once configuring localstatedir=/opt/deploy/squid/var using ./configure, for 
workers > 1, the squid is looking for /opt/deploy/squid/var/runsquid. The 
directory has to be created properly before starting squid.

all helpers must be defined in process_number > 1 respectively, otherwise, 
there are extra helpers launched by process_number = 0 like crtd.

The document is not clear on this, but we figure it out now.

Alex
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:21:09 -0700
Subject: Re: [squid-users] sslbump and caching of generated cert




figured it out. It needs all helpers under the process id. I have content 
redirect helpers which are not under the process ids.

Alex


> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:44:49 +1200
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] sslbump and caching of generated cert
> 
> On 10/07/2015 7:03 a.m., Alex Wu wrote:
> > It seems the option http_port cannot be put under each process ID. If using 
> > workers, http_port cannot bind to ports specified from http_port.
> > 
> 
> ?? Works for me and many others.
> 
> What I dont expect to work is the *same* port line in two specific
> workers unless the coordinator process also is assigned to mediate its use.
> 
> The coordinator always needs a generic port for its own use. 3128 is
> officially registered for that. But that is a separate problem to what
> you are describing.
> 
> Amos
> 
                                          

_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users                               
          
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

Reply via email to