Yes, really. ufdbGuard, like squidGuard before it, is a URL Filter that filters known unwanted URLs. A content filter, like DansGuardian and E2Guardian are content filters which examine the content of web pages looking for unwanted things.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Yuri Voinov <yvoi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > O, really? > > 17.08.15 4:03, Stanford Prescott пишет: > > ufdbGuard is not a content filter. > > > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Yuri Voinov <yvoi...@gmail.com> > <yvoi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > ufdbguard does. > > > > 16.08.15 20:27, Stanford Prescott пишет: > > > > >>> I have SquidClamAV implemented with the Smoothwall Express 3.1 > firewall. > > It > > >>> works well and fast with ssl-bump, although the majority of our users > > only > > >>> have relatively small networks with smaller loads. > > >>> > > >>> FYI, E2Guardian has replaced the DansGuardian project and is > currently > > well > > >>> maintained. E2Guardian can do content filtering for SSL but only in > > >>> explicit mode, It currently does not support intercept (transparent) > mode > > >>> for SSLBump. > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Alex Rousskov < > > >>> rouss...@measurement-factory.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> On 08/13/2015 10:31 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > >>>>> AFAICS it > > >>>>> is the backend AV library only scanning disk objects that causes > the > > >>>>> whole issue. Otherwise the eCAP could be much, much faster. > > >>>> > > >>>> The situation is more nuanced: eCAP supports asynchronous adapters. > It > > >>>> is possible to write a ClamAV adapter that writes messages to disk > and > > >>>> analyses them without blocking Squid. Doing so should eliminate most > > >>>> overheads between Squid and ClamAV. > > >>>> > > >>>> Factory ClamAV adapter can run in asynchronous mode, but threads are > > >>>> only used for _analysis_ of written files. We have not optimized the > > >>>> file writing part (yet?). Hopefully, using a RAM-based file system > can > > >>>> mitigate a large part of that performance damage (as well as address > > >>>> some of the security concerns related to disk storage?). > > >>>> > > >>>> A bigger performance problem, AFAICT, is that ClamAV does not > support > > >>>> incremental analysis. It waits for the entire file to be downloaded > > >>>> first. This breaks the message delivery pipeline and increases > > >>>> user-perceived response time. This problem cannot be solved outside > the > > >>>> ClamAV library. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Cheers, > > >>>> > > >>>> Alex. > > >>>> > > >>>> _______________________________________________ > > >>>> squid-users mailing list > > >>>> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org > > >>>> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> squid-users mailing list > > >>> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org > > >>> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users > > > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> squid-users mailing list > >> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org > >> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users > >> > >> > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV0QpsAAoJENNXIZxhPexG24gIAMNuWsyfn/QkXWTXROZEJYL1 > 0frhC+w22fjV8svGjTrZEtSKY4LTHiHEjp99bPBEpPdoCURifUq20m018qRoIcEA > XZfadD+s47bT7FvZbc2W58BQZUsWvotQRMNDPE+Mf0e38ev6PXsj16SaHmWytdx2 > Z9H0y5qlgJwwbUyfps4uQn1wF16Qlf2Fw5TGRUbBrij+rjPYzDSXTXxtfT+4j/3V > 4lZ0bN0HSFfvJrbfcpPoMCnSlRyJOm/b6Rxqv7v733OtrY/41EW1+HE1HOmW0em3 > rwpAV1KgWrwMZYHcIBE147itXlz1RGQutX01auiiSvm/hO3h78rl6aSawmanOAM= > =GgTR > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users