On 2016-10-22 17:56, Antony Stone wrote:
Disclaimer: I am not a Squid developer.
On Saturday 22 October 2016 at 14:43:55, gar...@comnet.uz wrote:
IMO:
The only reason I believe [explains] why core developers of Squid tend
to
move HTTP violating settings from average users is to prevent possible
abuse/misuse.
I believe the reason is that one of Squid's goals is to be RFC
compliant,
therefore it does not contain features which violate HTTP.
Nevertheless, I believe that core developers should publish an
_official_ explanations regarding the tendency, as it often becomes a
"center of gravity" of many topics.
Which "tendency"?
What are you asking for an official explanation of?
Antony.
Since I started use Squid, it's configuration always RFC compliant by
default, _but_ there were always knobs for users to make it HTTP
violent. It was in hands of users to decide how to handle a web
resource. Now it is not always possible, and the topic is an evidence.
For example, in terms of this topic, users can't violate this RFC
statement [1]:
A Vary field value of "*" signals that anything about the request
might play a role in selecting the response representation, possibly
including elements outside the message syntax (e.g., the client's
network address). A recipient will not be able to determine whether
this response is appropriate for a later request without forwarding
the request to the origin server. A proxy MUST NOT generate a Vary
field with a "*" value.
[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-7.1.4
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
