On Sunday 23 October 2016 at 15:26:54, Yuri Voinov wrote:
> You can have slow DNS. Consider to use local caching DNS recursor as
> source for proxy & users.
Why would that result in requests via Squid being slower than direct?
@Krishna: You *have* confirmed that Squid requests are slower than direct
requests, for the same URL, at the same time, haven't you?
Antony.
> 23.10.2016 18:42, Krishna Kulkarni пишет:
> > Hi Antony,
> > Thanks for the reply. I have made changes in squid.conf as per your
> > suggestion and have allocated 20 GB of Hard disk space.
> > Squid server at my location handles http/https requests for more than
> > 500 hosts. But at peak hours squid usually performs very slow and
> > browser takes 1-2 minutes just to serve google home page and more time
> > than that for heavy web page.
> >
> > I have verified network link utilization & found it consumes not more
> > than 15 mb whereas link bandwidth is of 45mb but still squid serves web
> > pages very slow to client hosts.
> >
> > Any suggestions in squid configuration to overcome this issue would be
> > highly appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Krishna.
--
"If I've told you once, I've told you a million times - stop exaggerating!"
Please reply to the list;
please *don't* CC me.
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
