24.10.2016 16:42, Alex Crow пишет:
On 24/10/16 11:26, Yuri wrote:
No, Amos, I'm not trolling your or another developers.
I just really do not understand why there is a caching proxy, which
is almost nothing can cache in the modern world. And that in vanilla
version gives a maximum of 10-30% byte hit. From me personally, it
needs no justification and no explanation. And the results.
I can not explain to management why no result, referring to your
explanations or descriptions of standards. I think it's understandable.
At the present time to obtain any acceptable result it is necessary
to make a hell of a lot of effort. To maintenance such installation
is not easy.
And as with every new version of the caching level it falls - and it
is very easy to check - it is very difficult to explain to
management, is not it?
It's not my imagination - this is confirmed by dozens of Squid
administrators, including me personally familiar. Therefore, I would
heed to claim that I lie or deliberately introduce someone else astray.
I'd rather have to explain to management about a low hitrate than have
to explain why they weren't seeing the content they expected to see,
or that some vital transaction did not go through, but, hey look here,
we're saving 80% of web traffic bill!
So, what are you talking about - the smallest of the problems that can
be easily testing and solving by existing functionality - such as no_cache.
In any case - it is the choice of each and I only wish to have all
possible tools. And not to have my hands tied.
Especially when there are competing products that provide the desired
results. Yes, they cost money. But management is not often ask - just
buy what they need, by they opinion, and you - with Squid - went to look
for a job. So simple.
--
This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain
confidential information. Unless you are that person, you may not
disclose its contents or use it in any way and are requested to delete
the message along with any attachments and notify us immediately.
This email is not intended to, nor should it be taken to, constitute
advice.
The information provided is correct to our knowledge & belief and must
not
be used as a substitute for obtaining tax, regulatory, investment,
legal or
any other appropriate advice.
"Transact" is operated by Integrated Financial Arrangements Ltd.
29 Clement's Lane, London EC4N 7AE. Tel: (020) 7608 4900 Fax: (020)
7608 5300.
(Registered office: as above; Registered in England and Wales under
number: 3727592). Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority (entered on the Financial Services Register; no. 190856).
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
