28.05.2017 21:09, Eduardo Carneiro пишет:
> Ok. Tell me what technical details you need and I post here.
Configs. Logs. Topology. Usecases. Examples for single transactions.
>
> But if this were an ignoring cache-control issue, wouldn't that happen on
> squid 3.5.19 and previous versions as well?
>
> With the same conf works on 3.5.19 but not in newest squid3 versions.
Once more. Ignoring cache-control in squid is deprecated due to RFC
requirements. So, it leads to drops down with byte HIT in general. I do
not remember when it exactly desupported in squid's code, but seems
approx. at some 3.5.x.

I can't to say exactly, because of using Squid 5.x branch right now.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Youtube-not-TCP-HIT-Squid3-5-21-25-tp4682582p4682610.html
> Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

Reply via email to