Amos, I opened a bug report: https://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5251 hopefully I got the wording right, please edit it if needs be.
in the meantime, is there any workaround to be used? On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 at 03:00, Amos Jeffries <squ...@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > On 29/11/2022 9:07 pm, N wrote: > > Hi Amos, > > thanks for the quick response. > > > > following your comments, my configuration now looks like this: > > acl auth_users proxy_auth REQUIRED > > http_access deny !auth_users > > acl wg_uk note user uk > > tcp_outgoing_address 10.200.0.70 wg_uk > > tcp_outgoing_address fe80::bd02:7fd9:3f4b:4a22 wg_uk > > > > still, the traffic is not going through the wg_uk interface. > > > > the logs are huge when using squid -k debug, so I wasn't sure what I > > should clip. > > I decided to add the full log of the few requests that were tested, > > hope it's ok, and that you can understand something from it. > > Log is great. It confirms a bug happening. The wg_uk ACL produces a > non-matches on the first time it scans the tcp_outgoing_address list, > then matches on the second IP tested. It should be always matching or > always non-matching. > > Please report this to the project bugzilla > (<http://bugs.squid-cache.org>) for tracking. > I am about to try to replicate the issue here and will update the report > with my findings in the next day or so. > > > Cheers > Amos > > _______________________________________________ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users >
_______________________________________________ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users