* Mike Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I've done some benchmarks for my own amusement, and found that XFS is > significantly slower at dealing with small files than ReiserFS, ext2, > ext3 :- > > http://blackhairy.demon.co.uk/notes/fs-benchmarks.html > > Mind you I'll be the first to admit that the benchmarks are hardly > rigorous.
Interesting: http://conferences.oreilly.com/presentations/os2002/wessels_duane.ppt seems to say the same -- Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V a) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charite Campus Mitte Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 Referat V a - Kommunikationsnetze - Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-916 AIM: ralfpostfix
