On Wednesday 20 August 2003 19.52, Jim_Brouse/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I searched access.log and I did find a mention of 000000000000007 > although it is part of a URL. Some how the access.log is different > than normal so then SARG is running against the wrong fields. What > do you think is the best way to fix this log? The log is 121 > Meg's. I also have another failed log with 28 megs.
Try isolating a number of lines you think are the cause to this confusion and then run a SARG report on these. If the probelem is reporoducible contact the SARG maintainers and give them the test data to reproduce the error. Regards Henrik
