--- Peter Lustig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you don't need the support, I would also suggest > to take a stable and > heavily tested Debian Woody. With this one, you can > always be sure to > get security updates even in the not so close > future. With SuSE you can > not be sure to get updates in two years or later.
not sure i understand what you mean by this statement.. > > Some useful links (at least they were useful for > me): > > Which filesystem to choose for the cache disks: > http://conferences.oreillynet.com/presentations/os2002/wessels_duane.ppt > > This article helped me a lot: > http://www.devshed.com/c/a/Administration/High-Performance-Web-Caching-With-Squid/2/ thanks, will definitely check these out... > > > > > Besides that, I started with SuSE (7.0) too, but by > getting more > advanced it always was a pain in the ass when yast > overwrote my manually > edited configuration files. well, that was a problem with SuSEconfig.. it has since matured and doesn't give me any of those problems nowadays.. i guess it's all about being there thru thick and thin.. :).. Regards, Mark. ___________________________________________________________ WIN FREE WORLDWIDE FLIGHTS - nominate a cafe in the Yahoo! Mail Internet Cafe Awards www.yahoo.co.uk/internetcafes
