> Hi all, > > I've read that aufs and diskd are much much better than ufs. > I am trying to > decide between the two. > > I've read that aufs is the better one (in terms of performance), but > probabability of crashing is higher?
I haven't seen problems with my aufs based configuration in months.... > > I am willing to sacrifice a bit of performance gain but would > like to have > maximum stability. Can anyone advice which would be the better choice? > The choice is OS dependend : under FreeBSD diskd is the better choice. Under Solaris and Linux use aufs. M.
