Dear RIP This sounds interesting, Could you please share your memory usage and Squid log file with us?
I hope we will find something. Regards Babar Kazmi >From: "RIP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [squid-users] squid sucks? ;-( >Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:07:36 +0200 > >Hi! > >Hard to bolive myself I am talking that after houngreds of hours spend on >watching/configuring/tunning/etc squid, but here it goes.. > >4x DSL >1090 Kbps download max per DSL, one squid box, > >Configuration A >transparent redirect to squid, >cachemgr stats: >Cache Misses: ~0.10000 >DNS Lookups: ~0.10000 >CPU Usage: ~10-20% >Cache hits: ~None (cache_dir null /tmp <-- for testing) > >HTB limit 950Kbit per DSL >WRR attached per DSL >acticve users: ~50 per DSL > >Configuration B >some as A but no redirection to squid > >1/4 clients to each DSL >HTB limit 950Kbit per DSL >WRR (weight round robin) attached per DSL >users get always all avaiable bandwidth (wrr) > >testing procedure: > >www.numion.com/yourspeed (20second test) >one computer attached to dsl1, second one to dsl2 > >squid off, users go directly (masquarade), htb wrr attached >hour computer1 computer2 >19:49 528kbps 261kbps >19:52 594kbps 518kbps >19:55 431kbps 575kbps >19:59 582kbps 540kbps > >squid on, transparent redirection, htb wrr attached >20:02 181 223 >20:06 187 166 >20:09 175 126 > >squid off, users go directly (masquarade), htb wrr attached >20:12 405 322 >20:16 423 286 >20:19 367 324 > >squid on, transparent redirection, htb wrr attached >20:23 92 126 >20:25 144 164 >20:27 200 186 >20:28 157 160 > >squid off, users go directly (masquarade), htb wrr attached >20:29 679 378 >20:32 542 249 >20:35 542 435 >20:39 545 216 >20:42 309 537 >20:45 471 350 > >average fps squid on, computer1: 164kbps >average fps squid off, computer1: 493kbps > >some one can explan this? >some one can do test to confirm/negate that? > >regards. > >--RIP-- >
